Disposed

Alok Kumar Hazra @ Alok Hazra v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC28 Sept 2022CRR/308/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a Criminal Revision filed under Section 482 CrPC challenging a conviction under Section 138 NI Act. The petitioner deposited the full compensation amount ordered by the trial court, and the opposite party did not contest this submission, leading to the dismissal of the revision.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Revision is disposed of without consideration based on the deposit of compensation.

Alok Kumar Hazra @ Alok Hazra Vs State of West Bengal — Cheque Dishonour | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

28.9.2022 30 SB Ct. No.236

¶2

CRR 308 of 2012

¶3

In the matter of : Alok Kr. Hazra @ Alok Hazra

¶4

Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta ….. for the petitioner

¶5

Mr. N.P. Agarwal Mr. Pratick Bose … for the State Ms. Kriti Mishra … for the O.P. No. 2

¶6

The petitioner Mr. Alok Kr. Hazra by filing the application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has challenged the legality of the judgment passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track 2^nd Court, Haldia, Purba Medinipur in Criminal Appeal No. 733 of 2011 on 14.12.2011. By the impugned order the learned Appellate Court affirmed the judgment passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia in C.R. Case No. 110 of 2007 on 27.6.2011. By the impugned judgment the petitioner was found guilty for committing offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and was directed to pay a sum of Rs.2 Lakhs towards compensation and to suffer imprisonment till rising of the Court. Mr. Samanta learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that on 03.4.2012 a sum of Rs.75,000/- was deposited in the office of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia and on 10.5.2022 the remaining sum of Rs.1,25,000/- has also been deposited by the petitioner and thus the petitioner has complied with the

¶7

mandate of the learned Trial Court affirmed by the learned First Appellate Court.

¶8

Supplementary affidavit has also been filed stating inter alia the facts, as submitted annexing photocopy of receipts; same is taken on record.

¶9

Ms. Kriti Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 does not contest the contention made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner regarding payment of money in compliance with the order of the learned Trial Court.

¶10

Under such circumstances the petition under consideration merits no consideration. Criminal Revision is thus stands disposed of.

¶11

(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)

Alok Kumar Hazra @ Alok Hazra v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alok Kumar Hazra @ Alok Hazra v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chapa Oraon Vs Jayeeta Mukherjee & Anr.

Susanta Debnath Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Manoj Kumar Rajak @ Manoj Rajak Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Guljarilal Agarwal @ Mandiwal Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Britannia Industries Ltd. & Ors. Vs State

Jaharlal Ghosh @Pukari Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.