Disposed

Pradip Kumar Kar v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC25 Feb 2022CRR/3009/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge High Court order disposed of a bail/revisional application (CRR 3009 of 2016) filed under Sections 397/401 read with 482 CrPC. The court noted that misplaced prosecution documents had been traced and the trial court was directed to communicate the disposal order to the accused and proceed with the charge-sheet process within 60 days.

What did the court decide?

The revisional application is disposed of; interim orders vacated; pending applications disposed of; trial court directed to complete charge-sheet process within 60 days.

Pradip Kumar Kar Vs State of West Bengal — Calcutta HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

25.02.2022

¶2

Item No.7 Ct.No.34 dc.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

¶4

C.R.R. 3009 of 2016

¶5

(Via Video Conference)

¶6

Pradip Kumar Kar & Ors. versus

¶7

The State of West Bengal

¶8

In Re : An Application under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Burdwan Police Station Case No. 776 of 2009 dated 25.11.2009 under Sections 384/511/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Mr. Debojit Samanta, Mr. S. Koley … For the Petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya … For the State.

¶11

A report dated 23.02.2022 submitted by Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya, learned advocate appearing for the State which has been prepared by the Inspector-in-Charge, Burdwan Police Station be kept on record.

¶12

The report reflects that last date was fixed on 21.02.2022 and the next date has been fixed on 28.02.2022.

¶13

Learned advocate for the State submits that the case diary along with all the documents which were misplaced has already been traced out and the prosecution is ready to proceed with the case.

¶14

The report also reflects that the prosecution is ready with the documents under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Let the same be complied with on the next date as the accused persons are yet to receive the copies.

¶15

¶16

The learned Magistrate is directed to complete the process of consideration of charge within a period of 60 (sixty) days from the date of communication of this order.

¶17

Learned advocate for the State is directed to communicate this order and request his counterpart to place the same on the next date fixed in the learned trial court.

¶18

With the aforesaid observations, the revisional application being CRR 3009 of 2016 is disposed of.

¶19

Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.

¶20

All pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.

¶21

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶22

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶23

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

Pradip Kumar Kar v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradip Kumar Kar v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Musa Karim Molla Vs State of West Bengal& Ors.

Dhiren Saha Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mahitosh Ghoshal Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Biswajit Giri Vs State of West Bengal

Pradip Pradhan Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Amit Bapari Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.