Sk Abdul Karim & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
No.236 CRR 2811 of 2008 CRAN 1 of 2009 Mr.…
No.236 CRR 2811 of 2008 CRAN 1 of 2009 Mr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03.11.2022 62 SB Ct. No.236
CRR 2811 of 2008 CRAN 1 of 2009
Mr. Sukumar Ghosh Ms. Moumita Ghosh . … for the petitioners Mr. Bidyut Kr. Ray Ms. Rita Dutta … for the State
This revisional application has been filed challenging the legality of the order passed by the learned Executive Magistrate, Chinsurah, Sadar Hooghly in M.P. Case No. 255 of 2007 under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 29.7.2008.
For all practical purposes the effect of the order impugned withered away after sixty days of passing of the order.
Mr. Ghosh learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners fairly submits that the matter since has lost its relevance may be disposed of.
Smt. Rita Dutta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State is present.
Under such circumstances, having found the matter has become devoid of any merit, I am of the view that the same should be dismissed which I accordingly do.
The criminal revision is disposed of along with applications, if any.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
Mr. Sukumar Ghosh
Ms. Moumita Ghosh
The State
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court