Disposed

Sanatan Das v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Calcutta HC1 Jul 2022CRR/2725/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revisional application prayer for direction to produce original seizure list and expedite trial was disposed of after the State filed a certified copy. The court directed the trial court to proceed expeditiously within six months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to trial court to proceed with trial expeditiously within six months without unnecessary adjournments; appointment of State advocate regularised; certified copy to parties.

Sanatan Das Vs State of West Bengal & Anr. — Public Procurement and Tenders | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

47 1.7.2022 sb

¶2

CRR 2725 of 2018

¶3

In the matter of : Sanatan Das

¶4

…….Petitioner

¶5

Mr. Prosenjit Mukherjee Ms. Paulami Dutta Ms. Tiyasha Ghosh ….for the petitioner Mr. Prasun Kumar Dutta, Ld. APP Md. Kutubuddin Mr. Santanu Deb Roy …for the State

¶6

Status report along with the certified copy of the seizure list so submitted by the learned advocate for the State, be kept with the record.

¶7

The present revisional application has been directed with a prayer for a direction upon the Investigating Officer for production of original seizure list before the trial court, as the Investigating Officer failed and neglected to produce original seizure list before the trial court and for which the trial of the case got delayed and furthermore, the petitioner has also prayed for a direction upon the trial court to proceed with the trial as expeditiously as possible and to take it to its logical conclusion in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶8

Learned advocate for the State submits that the misplaced seizure list is now available for production before Trial Court and certified copy of the seizure list has been annexed with the status

¶9

¶10

report filed today and as such there is no impediment to proceed with the trial by the court concerned.

¶11

In view of the above, the instant revisional application being CRR 2725 of 2018 is disposed of with a direction upon the trial court to proceed with the trial as expeditiously as possible and take it to its logical conclusion in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of six months.

¶12

With the aforesaid direction, CRR 2725 of 2018 is accordingly disposed of.

¶13

Appointment of the learned advocate for the State may be regularised by the concerned authorities.

¶14

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

¶15

(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Sanatan Das v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanatan Das v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandhya Naskar & Ors. Vs Krishna Das

Vivek Agarwal Vs Raja Acharji

Nur Hadia Sams Mallick Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Jogendra Kumar Ganoria Vs Sandip Paul

Kinjal Mitra Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Laxman Prasad Agarwal @ Laxhman Prasad Agarwal Vs State of West Bengal