Minakshi Chandgothia v. Binay Kr Shaw
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a revisional application (CRR 2366 of 2013) filed by Minakshi Chandgothia for default as no appearance was made on her behalf, resulting in no accommodation.
This court dismissed a revisional application (CRR 2366 of 2013) filed by Minakshi Chandgothia for default as no appearance was made on her behalf, resulting in no accommodation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.12.2022 21 cm
CRR 2366 of 2013
Minakshi Chandgothia Vs.
Binay Kumar Shaw
The matter is pending since 2013. The matter got adjourned from time to time. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation is sought. It seems that the petitioner do not want to proceed with the case.
Accordingly, revisional application being CRR 2366 of 2013 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Minakshi Chandgothia
Binay Kumar Shaw
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court