The Court dismissed a revisional application (CRAN 1 of 2022) and a conditional bail revision application (CRAN 2 of 2022) filed by the applicant. The conditional bail prayer was rejected as the application was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.05. 2022 item No.20 n.b. ct. no. 34
CRR 2144 if 2016 +
IA No. CRAN 1 of 2022
+
CRAN 2 of 2022
Anusri Das Vs.
Shri Bibhas Pal & Anr.
Ms. D. Mitra
….. for the private opposite party no.1
Mr. Husen Mustafi,
Mr. Debasis Kar, …. For the opposite party. Mr. Arijit Ganguly,
Ms. Debjani Sahu,
….for the State.
Ms. Mitra, learned advocate appearing for the private opposite party no.1 prays for waver of some conditions, which were imposed when the opposite party was released on bail.
Learned advocate for the private opposite party is directed to take out a fresh application. The present application in its form is not maintainable.
Accordingly, CRAN 2 of 2022 is dismissed as not pressed.
As the revisional application has been disposed of, there is
no scope for recalling of the order dated 7.3.2022.
Accordingly, CRAN 1 of 2022 is also dismissed.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
2
( Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Anusri Das
Shri Bibhas Pal & Anr.
The State
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
