No substantive proposition as the petitioners voluntarily withdrew their revisional application, resulting in its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.7.2022 Court No.25 Sl. No. 1 SD
CRR 2087 of 2019
In the matter of: Smt. Rikta Karmakar & Ors.
Mr. Prasenjit Debnath Ms. Punam Basu
… for the Petitioners.
Ms. Punam Basu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits that the petitioners do not want proceed with the revisional application any further and want to withdraw the same.
Accordingly, CRR 2087 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Written instruction submitted by the petitioners be kept with
the record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Smt. Rikta Karmakar & Ors.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
