The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a criminal revisional application under sections 397, 401 and 482 CrPC for non-prosecution, where the petitioner indicated no inclination to proceed with the matter.
Revisional application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
[CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR]
**
CRR/1/2022
Aparna Roy . … Petitioner
Vs.
Saikat Roy … Respondent/OP
Mr. R.Arul Peter … for the petitioner
April 21, 2022 [SR] Item No. 3
The revisional application is listed today for hearing.
This application has been filed under section 397 read with sections 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 assailing order dated 16.11.2021 passed by Learned Judge, Family Court, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Port Blair in Misc.Case No.64 of 2020 under section 125 of Cr.P.C.
Mr. R. Arul Peter, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that no notice has been issued and served upon the opposite party. Furthermore, petitioner is not inclined to proceed with this revisional application and the same may be disposed of.
Considered.
Let the revisional application be dismissed for nonprosecution.
2
Let a copy of this order be sent to the Learned Judge, Family Court, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Port Blair for information.
(Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Aparna Roy
Saikat Roy
Ananda Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
