Revision filed for quashing of proceedings under Section 144 Cr.P.C. held infructuous as the proceeding had already been dropped by the Executive Magistrate; revision and connected applications dismissed.
Revision and connected applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.9.2022 S.D. 69.
C.R.R. 1910 of 2022 With CRAN 1 of 2022
Jagannath Maity Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr.Prithis Bandyopadhyay
…For the petitioner.
Mr. Prasun Kumar Datta, Ld.A.P.P., Mr. Nirupam Dhali
….For the State.
Mr. Balailal Sahoo Mr. Manoranjan Mahata
…For the O.P. Nos. 2, 3 & 4.
Affidavit of service be kept with the record.
The private opposite parties have entered appearance through Mr. Balailal Sahoo with Mr. Manoranjan Mahata, learned advocates. The State of West Bengal is represented by Mr. Prasun Kumar Datta with Mr. Nirupam Dhali, learned advocate.
The instant revision was filed praying for quashing of a proceeding under Section 144(2) of the Cr.P.C. being Misc. Case No. 1714 of 2021. Learned advocate for the private opposite party has filed a photostat copy of the order sheet and aforesaid Misc. Case No. 1714 of 2021. It appears from the order dated 8.9.2022 that the said proceeding has already been dropped by the learned Executive Magistrate.
Under such circumstances, the instant revision becomes infructuous.
2
Accordingly, the instant revision is dismissed being infructuous. With the dismissal of the instant revision, all connected
applications are also dismissed.
Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )
Jagannath Maity
The State of West Bengal
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
