The court held that the present revisional applications have become infructuous as the contested convicting order was reduced to a fine which had already been deposited by the petitioner. The applications are disposed of and covered by a previous order.
Applications disposed of as infructuous and covered by the order in CRR 914 of 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.03. 2022 item No.4 n.b. ct. no. 34
CRR 1731 of 1995
+
IA No. CRAN 1 of 2019( Old No. CRAN 4681 of 2019) +
CRAN 2 of 2019(Old No. CRAN 4683 of 2019) +
CRAN 3 of 2020
Jaladhar Pal
Vs.
State of West Bengal
Ms. Chandreyi Alam, Mr. Supriya Roy Chowdhury. Ms. Madhumita Roy Choudhury
.. for the petitioner.
Mr. Md. Anwar Hossain, Ms. Sreyashee Biswas
…..for the State
The subject matter of the present revisional application relates to the order of conviction and sentence passed against the petitioner by the Learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bishnupur in case no.123C of 1992 which was affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bishnupur in Criminal Appeal no.1 of 1994. As the order has been passed reducing the sentence to fine only which has already been deposited by the petitioner in CRR no.914 of 2020, the present revisional application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, CRR 1731 of 1995 is disposed of and will be covered by the order passed in CRR 914 of 2020.
All pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
2
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Jaladhar Pal
State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
