Single judge of the Calcutta High Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by noting that substantial grounds can be agitated during the trial, being at the initial stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02-03-2022 Subha Item-91 Ct -.34
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction (Via video-conference) C.R.R 1640 of 2017
In Re : An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
In the matter of : Rupa Mondal …Petitioner.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Earlier, an opportunity was granted by way of an order dated 9th February, 2022.
I have perused the contentions advanced in this revisional application and I find that the petitioner has substantial scope of agitating the same in course of the trial.
As such, no interference is called for because the petitioner has approached this court at the very initial stage of the proceedings.
Accordingly, the present revisional application being CRR 1640 of 2017 is dismissed.
All pending applications, if any, in connection with the revisional application, are consequently disposed of.
All concerned parties are to act in terms of a website copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.
( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )
2
Rupa Mondal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
