Petitioners failed to appear in a C.R.R. filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. No accommodation was sought. The revisional application was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.R. 1268 of 2013
26.09.2022
Sl. 37 Court No.33 cm
In the matter of: Uttam Kumar Das & Ors. ….petitioners.
None appears for the petitioners and no accommodation was sought, when the matter was called on 8th September, 2022, 9th September, 2022, 12th September, 2022, 13th September, 2022, 20th September, 2022, 21st September, 2022, 22nd September, 2022 and 23rd September, 2022. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. No accommodation is sought. Accordingly, revisional application being CRR 1268 of 2013 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Uttam Kumar Das & Ors.
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
