Ajit Kumar Ganguly v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge dismissed the quashing application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as the petitioner failed to appear for over a decade, causing the matter to lose its force.
The single judge dismissed the quashing application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as the petitioner failed to appear for over a decade, causing the matter to lose its force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03.02.2022 S.D. 11.
C.R.R. 1196 of 2011 (Via Video Conference)
In the matter of: Ajit Kumar Ganguly
……Petitioner.
Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy Ms. Sima Biswas
…For the State.
None appears for the petitioner. Mr. B.K. Roy and Ms. Sima Biswas appear for opposite party/ state. Their attendance be regularized.
The matter is listed today for necessary steps by the petitioner.
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. wherein the petitioner Ajit Kumar Ganguly prayed for quashing of Charge Sheet No. 238 of 2010 dated 31.8.2010 arising out of Khargram Police Station Case No. 78 of 2010 dated 10.4.2010 under Sections 409/420/34 of the IPC giving rise to G.R. Case No. 396 of 2010 pending before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kandi, Murshidabad.
This is old pending matter of the year 2011. The petitioner has not turned up for admission of the revision or taking steps upon opposite party/State of West Bengal.
2
In view of such disinclination of the petitioner to pursue this matter,
it loses its force and the same is dismissed.
Let a copy of the order be sent to the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kandi, Murshidabad for information.
( Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J. )
Ajit Kumar Ganguly
State of West Bengal
Ananda Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court