Dismissed
Debasish Burman v. State of West Bengal Anr.
Calcutta HCCRR/1122/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2022 item No.35 n.b. ct. no. 34 CRR 1122 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
2022 item No.35 n.b. ct. no. 34 CRR 1122 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.07. 2022 item No.35 n.b. ct. no. 34
CRR 1122 of 2009 With IA No. CRAN 1 of 2010) (Old No. CRAN 2880 of 2010)
Debasish Barman Vs.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Biswajit Manna, Mr. Santanu Talukdar
…..for the Petitioner
Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Sanjib Kr. Dan
…..for the State
Mr. Mukherjee, Learned Senior Advocate appears on behalf of the petitioner.
The present revisional application filed for quashing of the proceeding relating to G. R. Case No. 365 of 2009 arising out of Matigora Police Station case No. 78 dated 19.3.2009.
Today, when the matter has been called Mr. Arijit Ganguly, learned advocate appearing for the State has submitted a report. Report reflects that the Police Authority on conclusion of investigation submitted their report under Section 173 Cr. P.C. as ‘mistake of fact’. There is no scope for interfering with the proceeding at this stage, as the Investigating Authority has arrived at a conclusion that no evidence is available.
Report submitted by the learned advocate for the State be kept with the record.
2
Accordingly, CRR 1122 of 2009 is disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order
duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Debasish Barman
State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court