The court dismissed the special leave petition for non-prosecution, noting the appellant inadvertently filed the appeal instead of a criminal revision, allowing the appellant to file the latter.
The instant appeal be dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to file a criminal revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.03.2022
Sl. No. 04 Srimanta Ct.No.42
CRMSPL/10/2022
(Via Video Conference)
In Re : An application for special leave to appeal under Section 372(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
In the matter of : Amit Jhunjhunwala
…appellant.
Mr. Imran Siddiqui, Adv., Ms. A. Khatoon, Adv.
…for the appellant.
It is submitted by the Learned Advocate for the appellant that the appellant inadvertently has filed the instant appeal in place of a criminal revision which the appellant wanted to file.
In view of such circumstances, the instant appeal be dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to the appellant to file a criminal revision in accordance with law.
The appellant is at liberty to take the certified copies of the impugned order from the record.
( Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the special leave petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution given that the petitioner inadvertently filed it instead of a criminal revision.
Amit Jhunjhunwala
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
