Allowed

Sudipta Samaddar v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC15 Jul 2022CRM (SB)/139/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to the petitioner charged under IPC and Passports Act, noting that charges under the Foreigners Act were withdrawn. The court imposed a bond and specific reporting conditions for six months.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed; petitioner directed to furnish a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and abide by conditions of residence reporting and fortnightly appearance.

Sudipta Samaddar Vs State of West Bengal — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

15-07-2022 Subha Item no.19 Bail allowed

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side

¶3

Sudipta Samaddar -vs-

¶4

The State of West Bengal

¶5

In Re : An application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in connection with Swarupnagar P.S. Case No.196 of 2022 dated 06.03.2022 under section 188 of Indian Penal Code read with S.14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 and S.12 of the Passports Act, 1967.

¶6

Mr. Ali Ahsan Alamgir Mr. Atarul Haque Ms. Riya Das Ms. Rabia Khatoon

¶7

Mrs. Anasuya Sinha Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra

¶8

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 129 days and after completion of investigation, the Investigating Agency has submitted chargesheet under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of the Passports Act, 1967.

¶9

Mrs. Sinha, learned advocate appears on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of this court to different statements recorded by the Investigating Officer in course of the investigation.

¶10

I have perused the case diary and I find that the charges under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act have been dropped against the present petitioner. Having regard to the same, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of

¶11

¶12

the present petitioner is allowed.

¶13

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to furnish a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas.

¶14

If on bail, the petitioner shall abide by the following conditions:-

¶15

1. The petitioner shall intimate the place of his residence to the Officer-in-Charge of Basirhat Police Station. It is directed that the Officer-in-Charge, Ashokenagar Police Station would conduct an enquiry for the next six months for at least once a week for ascertaining the presence of the present petitioner at the address which would be furnished before the ld. A.C.J.M, Basirhat and send a report to the ld. A.C.J.M, Basirhat.

¶16

2. The petitioner shall attend the Office of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basirhat and obtain an acknowledgement from the concerned Officer once in a fortnight irrespective of the fact whether any date has been fixed by the court or not for the purposes of this case.

¶17

The aforesaid conditions so imposed would continue for the next six months.

¶18

The Petitioner is granted liberty to pray for modification after a period of six months from the date of his release.

¶19

With the aforesaid observations, the application for bail, being CRM (SB) 139 of 2022 is disposed of.

¶20

The report of the ASI, Swarupnagar P.S, Basirhat PD submitted through the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record.

¶21

All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶22

¶23

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on completion of usual formalities.

¶24

[Tirthankar Ghosh, J]

Sudipta Samaddar v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudipta Samaddar v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Namita Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Amal Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Subrata Kumar Pal Vs Sumana Pal (Biswas) & Anr.

Pulin Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal

Panchanan Dey & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Bangari Sai Mohan @ Sai Mohan Vs State of West Bengal