Dismissed

Saurav Halder v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC22 Jun 2022CRM (SB)/131/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed the revisional application for relaxing bail conditions as infructuous due to the petitioner's full compliance. It granted liberty to approach the trial court for confirmation of interim bail upon filing a prayer considering attendance records.

What did the court decide?

Liberty given to approach the trial court for confirmation of interim bail; application otherwise dismissed.

Saurav Halder Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

22.06.2022

¶2

Item No.68 Ct.No.34 dc.

¶3

C.R.M. (SB) 131 of 2022

¶4

In Re : Sri Saurav Halder

¶5

... Petitioner.

¶6

Ms. Malabika Saha Mr. Anand Keshari

¶7

... For the Petitioner. ... For the State.

¶8

The present revisional application under Section 439 has been preferred for relaxing the condition of bail of the accused/husband/petitioner granted by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore on 31^st May, 2022 in Titagarh Police Station Case No. 343 of 2022. By the impugned order, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore was pleased to observe that custodial detention of the accused/husband/petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation and as such, the bail petition made by the present petitioner/accused was allowed, but in interim form with the condition to meet the I.O. once in a week for one month.

¶9

Petitioner submits that he has already complied the said order and has attended on four occasions at the P.S. as directed by the learned Magistrate.

¶10

In view of the aforesaid compliance made by the accused/husband/petitioner, the prayer for relaxation of the said condition of interim bail has now become infructuous.

¶11

¶12

However, in view of the fact that the petitioner has attended the local P.S. on four occasions in compliance of the order dated 31^st May, 2022, liberty is given to the husband/petitioner to approach before the trial court for confirmation of the interim bail. In the event such prayer is made by the husband/petitioner before the concerned Magistrate, the Magistrate will dispose of the same after considering the fact of his attendance at P.S. in terms of order and other materials, if any, at the earliest.

¶13

Photostat copy in support of attendance of the petitioner at the P.S. be kept with the record.

¶14

CRM (SB) 131 of 2022, is, thus, disposed of.

¶15

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶16

(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Saurav Halder v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saurav Halder v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paritosh Biswas and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Sabra Khatun Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Alup Kumar Bhattarjee & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Tanmoy Som Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Essel Mining and Industries Ltd. Vs Anil Agarwal

Agnijoy Das & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.