Allowed

Amir Hossain Mistry Alias Amir Hossain v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC2 Feb 2022CRM (NDPS)/31/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Court in Bardhaman allowed bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case under Sections 27(b) and 21(b) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and NDPS Act. Bail was granted as no drugs were recovered from the petitioner and the case relied on co-accused's statement.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one local, subject to standard conditions.

Amir Hossain Mistry Alias Amir Hossain Vs State of West… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

02.02.2022

¶2

Sl. 40 Court No.29 suvayan (Allowed)

¶3

C.R.M. (NDPS) 31 of 2022

¶4

In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04.01.2022 in connection with Swarupnagar P.S. Case No. 494/20 dated 04/10/2020 under Section 27 (b) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act read with Section 21 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. And

¶5

In the matter of: Amir Hossain Mistry alias Amir Hossain ….petitioner Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty …for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Mr. Palash Chandra Majhi …for the State.

¶6

Petitioner seeks bail.

¶7

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner sought to be falsely implicated on the basis of the statement made by the co-accused while in custody. No recovery was made from the possession of the petitioner.

¶8

Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that the police filed charge-sheet.

¶9

Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet and considering the fact that no narcotic was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and considering the fact that petitioner sought to be proceeded against on the basis of the statement made by the co-accused while in custody, we are of the view that the petitioner is able to over come the restriction under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

¶10

Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Judge, Special Court under the NDPS Act, Barasat, North 24 Porganas subject to the condition that during bail he shall appear

¶11

¶12

before the learned trial court on the date fixed till disposal of the trial and he shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

¶13

In the event the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the bail without any further reference to this Court.

¶14

The application for bail being C.R.M. (NDPS) 31 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of.

¶15

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶16

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Amir Hossain Mistry Alias Amir Hossain v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amir Hossain Mistry Alias Amir Hossain v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradip Rana and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

MD Rinku and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Brihaspati Maity Vs State of West Bengal

Ajijul Hakim Vs the State of West Bengal

Jiyaul Hoque @ Ziyaul Hoque Vs the State of West Bengal

Sheru Mohammed Alias Sheru MD Vs State of West Bengal