Petitioner prayed for bail under Section 439 CrPC. Court held lack of material change in circumstances since prior rejection warrants continuation of detention. Bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.04.2022
Sl. 02 Court No.29 suvayan (rejected)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRM (DB) 76 of 2022 (Via Video Conference)
In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 24.03.2022 in connection with Rajgang P.S. case No. 525 of 2021 dated 24/11/2021 under Sections 448/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code And In the matter of: Tulsi Chhetri ….petitioner. Ms. Madhushri Dutta …for the petitioner. Mr. Aditi Shankar chakraborty Mr. Biswarup Roy …for the State.
Petitioner renews the prayer for bail.
Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the only
change in circumstances is the period of detention.
The earlier order of rejection is dated February 16, 2022. There is hardly any material change in circumstances subsequent to the earlier order of rejection warranting the court to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
C.R.M. (DB) 76 of 2022 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves bail considering limited change in detention period.
Whether the earlier rejection order needs revision based on current circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tulsi Chhetri
State
Debangsu Basak
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
