This single-judge order disposed of an application under Section 439(2) CrPC seeking cancellation of bail granted in 2009 in a video conference hearing. The court dismissed the application, noting the absence of the petitioner for over a decade and the lack of cogent reasons for revocation.
Application for cancellation of bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.02.2022 Sl. No. 06 Srimanta Ct. No. – 42 D/L
CRM/6622/2009 (Via Video Conference)
In Re: An application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
And
In the matter of : Sofia Yasmin Khan
… Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Datta, Ld. A.P.P., Mr. Santanu Deb Roy, Adv.
…for the State.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner. By filing the instant petition in the year 2009 the de facto complainant has prayed for cancellation of bail granted by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on 3rd March, 2009.
Since no step has been taken on behalf of the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 is enjoying the liberty for last 13 years, I do not find any cogent reason for cancellation of his bail.
The application is, thus, dismissed .
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail granted thirteen years ago should be cancelled on failure by the petitioner to take requisite steps.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State
Sofia Yasmin Khan
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
