Allowed

Jyoti Kishan Mishra v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC8 Dec 2022CRM (A)/5713/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail matter, the court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with an FIR for theft and cheating. The court held that the case diary materials did not justify custodial interrogation and directed the issuance of a bond with conditions.

What did the court decide?

The application for anticipatory bail is allowed; the petitioner is directed to execute a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Jyoti Kishan Mishra Vs State of West Bengal — Cheating and Forgery | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

08.12.2022 43 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed

¶2

C.R.M.(A) 5713 of 2022

¶3

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Golabari Police Station Case No. 280 of 2022 dated 18.07.2022 under Sections 379/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶4

And

¶5

In Re : Jyoti Kishan Mishra

¶6

...… petitioner

¶7

Mr. Arnab Sinha Mr. Abhradip Jha Mr. Amartya Basu .…for the petitioner

¶8

Mr. Sourav Chatterjee Mr. Bikram Mitra .…for the de-facto complainant

¶9

Mr. Sujan Chatterjee .…for the State

¶10

There is a previous proceeding under Section 498A of the

¶11

Indian Penal Code, 1860 lodged by the petitioner.

¶12

State and the de-facto complainant are represented.

¶13

Learned advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant

¶14

submits that, the petitioner took away ornaments and two bangles belonging to the de-facto complainant. The petitioner is not responding to the notices issued under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He submits that, the ornaments spoken of by the police belongs to the de-facto complainant as ‘stridhan’ articles.

¶15

Admittedly, the present police complaint is second in point of time.

¶16

¶17

The issues as to whether the ornaments were stolen or whether they were made over by the de-facto complainant to the petitioner are issues to be decided at the trial. The materials in the case diary does not suggest need for custodial interrogation of the petitioner.

¶18

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶20

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

¶21

Jyoti Kishan Mishra v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyoti Kishan Mishra v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Minakshi Mukherjee and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Dr Sourav Kundu Vs State of West Bengal

Subrata Adhikary Vs State of West Bengal

Shyamapda Lohar Vs State of West Bengal

Rina Khatun @ Bibi Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Sadhan Chandra Vs State of West Bengal