In an interim order, the Jalpaiguri bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC filed by the petitioner, on the ground that he chose not to proceed with the application and withdrew it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.02.2022
CIRCUIT BENCH OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT AT JALPAIGURI
COURT : 01 AT JALPAIGURI ITEM : 43 MATTER : 438 STATUS : DAW TRANSCRIBER : nandy CRM (A) 53 of 2022
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on January 11, 2022 in connection with Sahebganj Police Station Case No. 191 of 2020 dated 03.05.2021 under Sections 21(C)/22(C) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act. (NDPS Case No.25 of 2020).
In the matter of : Ajidul Haquie Mr. Hillol Saha Poddar, Advocate Mr. Ujjwal Luksom, Advocate Mr. Sourav Ganguly, Advocate
And ...Petitioner ...for the Petitioner
...for the State
The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that his client does not want to proceed with the instant application at this stage.
In view of the above, the application being CRM (A) 53 of 2022 is dismissed as withdrawn .
(Harish Tandon, J)
(Rabindranath Samanta, J)
Ajidul Haquie
State
Harish Tandon
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
