Allowed

Sujoy Kumar Das @ Sujay Kumar Das and Others v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC22 Aug 2022CRM (A)/3904/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge Court granted anticipatory bail to seven petitioners involved in an IPC case involving seized stridhan articles, imposing reporting and cooperation conditions and a bond of Rs. 10,000.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties, monthly reporting, and appearance on all future dates.

Sujoy Kumar Das @ Sujay Kumar Das and Others Vs State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

4 (AD)	22.08.2022	C.R.M. (A) 3904 of 2022
	Court No.29 (Allowed)	In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection withNimtaP.S. Case No.418 of 2022dated24/07/2022under Sections 406/34of the Indian Penal Code. And
		In the matter of: Sujoy Kumar Das @ Sujay Kumar Das & Ors. ….petitioners.
		Mr. Achyut Basu Ms. Punam Basu …for the petitioners.
		Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Ld. APP Ms. Sayanti Santra …for the State.
		Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.
		Report submitted in Court be taken on record. It is submitted on behalf of the State that, stridhan
		articles were seized.

¶2

Considering the materials in the case diary and considering the fact that the Investigating Officer was in a position to seize the stridhan articles, it would be appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶3

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner nos.1 ,4,6 and 7, namely, Sujoy Kumar Das @ Sujay Kumar Das, Sisir Kumar Bhar @ Sisir Bhar, Sushanta Kumar Das @ Tarak Das and Siddhartha Dass @

¶4

¶5

Jhumpu, will report before the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation and petitioner nos.2,3 and 5, namely, Swati Das (Deb) @ Sathi Deb, Rupan Bhar @ Rupom Bhar @ Rupon Bhar and Rina Das @ Munni Das, will cooperate with the investigation till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶6

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

¶7

C.R.M. (A) 3904 of 2022 is disposed of.

¶8

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶9

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Sujoy Kumar Das @ Sujay Kumar Das and Others v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujoy Kumar Das @ Sujay Kumar Das and Others v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs Saiyed Khan

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs Saddam Hussain Laskar @ Saddam

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs Satyaranjan Mondal @ Kadan and Anr.

Mohosin Ali @ Mahasin Ali Sekh Vs State of West Bengal

Sefali Bibi Vs Anikul Alam Biswas @ Kharab and Anr.

Kumaresh Ghosh Vs State