Petitioner applied for anticipatory bail. Having surrendered and taken into judicial custody, the application was disposed of as infructuous without further detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.08.2022 Serial no.4 Aloke
CRM (A) 3724 of 2022
In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanchal Police Station Case No. 443 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 under Sections 376/417 of the Indian Penal Code.
-And-
In the matter of : Najrul Islam
… … Petitioner Mr. Raju Mondal, Advocate … … For the Petitioner Mr. Bidyut Kr. Roy, Advocate Ms. Rita Datta, Advocate … …For the State
Report as called for by the order dated August5, 2022 filed be taken on record.
The Court is informed that the petitioner surrendered before the jurisdictional Court and was taken into judicial custody.
In such circumstances, CRM (A) 3724 of 2022 is disposed of as infructuous.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
Najrul Islam
State
Debangsu Basak
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
