Allowed

Imran Sk and Anr. v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC21 Apr 2022CRM (A)/1648/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a matrimonial dispute involving offences under IPC 498A and related sections under Section 438 CrPC, imposing conditions regarding bail bonds, sureties, and reporting.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions of reporting and daily court appearances.

Imran Sk and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal — Matrimonial and Divorce | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

7 21.04.2022 C.R.M. (A) 1648 of 2022 (AD) Court No.29 (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with English Bazar P.S. Case No. 204 of 2021 dated 17/02/2021 under Section 498A/323/313/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of D.P. Act (G.R. No.844 of 2021). And In the matter of: Imran Sk. & Anr. ….petitioners. Mr. Minoti Gomes Mr. Musharraf Alam Sk. …for the petitioners. Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy Ms. Rita Datta …for the State.

¶2

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

¶3

Report as called for by the order dated April 11, 2022 filed in Court be taken on record.

¶4

It appears from the report that the de facto complainant and the petitioner no.1 are living as husband and wife presently.

¶5

Considering such conduct of the de facto complainant and the petitioner and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶6

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners will report before the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the

¶7

¶8

investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶9

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

¶10

C.R.M. (A) 1648 of 2022 is disposed of.

¶11

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶12

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Imran Sk and Anr. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imran Sk and Anr. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sangita Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Kaushik Kumar Kar Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Imamul Hak Alias Imamul Haque Vs State of West Bengal

Sabir Hosen Mollah Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Mohirul Hoque Vs State of West Bengal

Prabir Mandi Vs State of West Bengal