prasanta das v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
Serial no.50 Aloke (Through Video…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.01.2022 Serial no.50
Aloke Ct. No. 29
(Through Video Conference)
CRM (A) 117 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. -AndIn the matter of : Prasanta Das … …Petitioner Mr. Arup Kr. Bhowmick, Advocate … … For the Petitioner Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Advocate Ms. Sujata Das, Advocate … … For the State
On the prayer of the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, CRM (A) 117 of 2022 is dismissed as not pressed. State is represented.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prasanta Das
- respondent
State
Coram
Debangsu Basak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM (A)/117/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court