The Court held that the petitioner consistently failed to appear despite repeated calls. Finding no accommodation sought, the Court dismissed the contempt application for default without costs.
Contempt application dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
151 29.06.2022. ab Ct. 40
C.P.A.N. 1474 of 2006
Mucha Molla
Vs. Tamal Kanti Das in WPA 17882 of 2006 Mucha Molla
Vs.
State of W.B.
IA No. CAN/1/2006 (Old No. CAN/8688/2006) IA No. CAN/1/2006 (Old No. CAN/8688/2006)
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.
No accommodation is sought for.
Accordingly, the contempt application is
dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.)
Mucha Molla
Tamal Kanti Das
State of W.B.
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
