The High Court dismissed a revisional application for want of prosecution after accepted written instructions from the petitioner's side to drop the proceedings.
Dismissal of the revisional application for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.11.2022 1 Ct. no. 652 sb
C.O. 964 of 2021
Sri Nimai Chandra Saha Vs.
Smt. Trisita Saha
Mr. Priyabrata Batabyal Mr. Anirban Sarkar …for the petitioner
Mr. U.A. Dewan Mr. A. Dewan …for the O.P. no. 1
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the revisional application any further and as such he prays for dismissal of the revisional application.
Let C.O. 964 of 2021 be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Written instructions submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner, is taken on record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Sri Nimai Chandra Saha
Smt. Trisita Saha
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
