The High Court dismissed the revisional application C.O. 308 of 2019 due to the petitioner's long-standing absence, lack of representation, and demonstrated lack of interest in proceeding with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.02.2022 (S/L-26) Ct.-18 (P.Jana)
( Via Video Conference )
C.O. 308 of 2019
Rajiv Thakkar alias Rajeev Thakkar -VsHDFC BANK LTD.
Ms. Soni Ojha Mr. S.B. Chatterjee,
… for the opposite party.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not represented. Neither accommodation is sought for on behalf of the petitioner.
It appears that the petitioner is not appearing since long. From the previous order it is also clear that he is not interested to proceed with the revisional application.
Learned counsel for the opposite party is present.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, CO 308 of 2019 is dismissed for default.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the party subject to compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Rajiv Thakkar alias Rajeev Thakkar
HDFC BANK LTD.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
