The High Court dismissed a revisional application (CO 2387 of 2019) filed by Rubia Bibi as infructuous because the original suit (Title Suit No. 56 of 2016) had already been dismissed for default by an order dated 07.4.2022. The petitioner was absent.
Revisional application CO 2387 of 2019 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S/L 2 20.12.2022 Court No.652 SD
CO 2387 of 2019
Rubia Bibi Vs.
Sk. Abdur Rahim
Mr. Avirup Mondal Mr. Ramij Munsi
… for the Opposite Party.
Petitioner is not represented in Court today when the matter is called on.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party submits that the suit out of which the present revisional application has arisen being Title Suit No.56 of 2016, has already dismissed for default vide order dated 07.4.2022.
In view of the above, C.O. 2387 of 2019 is dismissed as infructuous.
Copy of the order dated 07.4.2022 is taken on record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present revisional application should be allowed given that the underlying suit was dismissed for default.
Rubia Bibi
Sk. Abdur Rahim
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
