Allowed

Rathindra Nath Mitra v. Ratna Chattopadhaya

Calcutta HC12 Dec 2022CO/2386/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows an application for the transfer of original suit number 8 of 2016 from the court of Additional District Judge, Baruipur, to the court of Additional District Judge, Alipore, under Section 24 of the CPC, with a direction for early disposal.

What did the court decide?

The application is allowed; Original Suit No. 8 of 2016 is transferred from Baruipur to Alipore with a direction to conclude hearing within six months.

Rathindra Nath Mitra Vs Ratna Chattopadhaya — Succession and Inheritance | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

12.12.2022 200 Ct. no. 652 sb

¶2

C.O. 2386 of 2022

¶3

Sri Rathindra Nath Mitra Vs. Smt. Ratna Chattopadhyay

¶4

Mr. S. Mukherejee Mr. M.M. Bhattacharya Ms. R. Aktar …for the opposite party

¶5

Petitioner is not present.

¶6

Opposite party is represented.

¶7

This is an application under Section 24 of the Code

¶8

of Civil Procedure filed by the petitioner seeking transfer of Original Suit No. 8 of 2016 arising out of Misc. case no. 16 of 2016 from the court of learned Additional District Judge, Baruipur, South 24 parganas to the court of learned Additional District Judge, Alipore, South 24 parganas.

¶9

The petitioner pleaded that the petitioner being the only son of deceased Sudha Rani Mitra was an employee and he had to reside out of station during his service period. Said Sudha Rani Mitra died leaving behind petitioner and one daughter. Petitioner stated that on retirement when he returned to his parent’s house, he came to know that his mother has registered a will in respect of all the properties, keeping the petitioner in the dark. After the death of petitioner’s mother Smt. Ratna Chattopadhyay filed case for grant of probate and when

¶10

¶11

petitioner filed objection, said proceeding on transfer being renumbered as 0.S 8 of 2016. The petitioner stated that he is aged about 71 years and is suffering from various chronic disease and presently residing in Barrackpore and he is facing trouble to attend the court at Baruipur and as such, he has prayed for aforesaid transfer.

¶12

Learned counsel for the opposite party, Mr. Mukherjee submits that he has got no objection if the transfer as sought for is allowed but a direction may be given to the transferee court for making early disposal of the said proceedings, since the proceeding is pending for a long time.

¶13

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the consent given by the opposite party, C.O. 2386 of 2022 is allowed.

¶14

In view of above, learned District Judge, South 24 parganas, Alipore is hereby directed to withdraw the Original Suit No. 8 of 2016 arising out of Misc. case no. 16 of 2016 from the court of learned Additional District Judge, Baruipur, South 24 parganas and to transmit the same to the court of learned District Judge, Alipore within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of the order.

¶15

The transferee court shall serve fresh notice upon both the parties intimating the next date of hearing before proceeding further with the aforesaid proceeding.

¶16

¶17

The transferee court is requested to make every endeavour for expeditious disposal of the said proceeding and shall make every endeavour to conclude the hearing of the entire proceeding preferably within a period of six months from the date of communication of the order.

¶18

Since no affidavit-in-opposition has been filed, the allegations made in the revisional application deemed to have denied by the opposite party.

¶19

The department is directed to send a copy of the order to the learned District Judge, Alipore, South 24 parganas.

¶20

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

¶21

(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Rathindra Nath Mitra v. Ratna Chattopadhaya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rathindra Nath Mitra v. Ratna Chattopadhaya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Debabrati Maitra Vs Santanu Ghosh

Smt Sreejita Mitra Chakraborty Vs Smt Kaberia Chakraborty

Madhuri Ghosh Vs Mira Rani Ghosh & Ors.

Priyanka Shaw Vs Rajib Kr. Shaw

Bharati Mondal Vs Soumen Mondal

Gautam Mukherjee and Ors. Vs Abani Mohan Goswami