The High Court dismissed a revisional application (CO 1991 of 2019) as withdrawn by the petitioner through a written instruction dated November 5, 2022, and vacated an interim order earlier granted.
The revisional application was dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S/L 1 14.12.2022 Court No.652 SD
CO 1991 of 2019
Smt. Kajal Mondal Vs. Ekadasi Manna & Anr.
Mr. Satyajit Mandal Mr. Amit Bikram Mahata Mr. Shourik Naskar
… for the Petitioner.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner does not want to proceed further with the present revisional application and to that extent his client has send a written instruction dated November 5, 2022.
Accordingly, the present revisional being CO 1991 of 2019 application is dismissed as withdrawn.
The interim order, granted earlier, stands vacated.
Written instruction dated November 5, 2022 filed by the petitioner be kept with the record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Smt. Kajal Mondal
Ekadasi Manna
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
