The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the revisional application with liberty to file it afresh, disposing of the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30.08.2022 168 ss
C.O. 1590 of 2022
Smt. Paramita Ghosh
Vs. Sri Suporno Purakayastha
Ms. Sananda Bhattacharya Ms. Pritha Bhaumik
… For the petitioner
Mr. Bratin Kr. Dey Mr. Pradip Majumder Ms. Anjana Banerjee Mr. Pradeep Pandey
… For the opposite party
Learned lawyer appearing for the petitioner on instruction from her client submits that the petitioner intends to withdraw the revisional application with liberty to file a revisional application afresh.
The written instruction filed by the petitioner be kept on record.
I have heard learned lawyer appearing for the opposite party.
The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the revisional application with liberty to file a revisional application afresh in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the revisional application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Smt. Paramita Ghosh
Sri Suporno Purakayastha
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
