Disposed

Sutapa Saha v. Bablu Saha

Calcutta HC11 Aug 2022CO/1037/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench disposed of a revisional application under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of a mutual consent divorce suit, noting that the suit had become infructuous due to the parties' undertaking to withdraw it.

What did the court decide?

Revisional application and connected applications, if any, stood disposed of on the undertaking of the opposite party to withdraw the matrimonial suit.

Sutapa Saha Vs Bablu Saha — Matrimonial and Divorce | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

Ct. 11.8 No. 2022 14 86 akb

¶2

C.O. 1037 of 2014

¶3

IA No. CAN 1 of 2020 (Old No. CAN 2408 of 2020) IA No. CAN 2 of 2020 (Old No. CAN 2423 of 2020)

¶4

Sutapa Saha -VersusBablu Saha

¶5

Mr. Bhabani Prosad Mondal Mr. Sukanta Mondal Mr. Kaustav Chatterjee …For the Petitioner Mr. Abdur Rakib …For the Opposite Party

¶6

This revisional application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the petitioner, Sutapa Saha, seeking transfer of a Matrimonial Suit, being No. 70 of 2013 (Old No. Mat Suit No. 165 of 2013) from the Court of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Baruipur.

¶7

As submitted by the learned Lawyers appearing for the parties, the petitioner, Sutapa Saha and the opposite party, Bablu Saha have filed a matrimonial suit under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking dissolution of their marriage on mutual consent in the Court of the learned Additional District Judge, Barrackpore. That being so, the matrimonial suit, being No. 70 of 2013 (Old No. Mat Suit No. 165 of 2013) filed by the opposite party has now become infructuous.

¶8

Learned Lawyer appearing for the opposite party submits that his client undertakes that he will withdraw the matrimonial suit pending in the Court at Baruipur soon. According to learned Lawyer this revisional application may be disposed of recording the undertaking of his client.

¶9

Since, the matrimonial suit under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage

¶10

¶11

between the parties on mutual consent, has been filed, the matrimonial suit, being No. 70 of 2013 (Old No. Mat Suit No. 165 of 2013) has now become infructuous.

¶12

Placing reliance on the undertaking given by the learned Lawyer on behalf of his client that the opposite party will withdraw the matrimonial suit, I think that the instant revisional application may be disposed of accordingly.

¶13

Therefore, in view of the undertaking given by the opposite party, the revisional application and connected applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶14

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶15

Urgent photostat copy of the order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on priority basis on compliance of all necessary formalities.

¶16

( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)

Sutapa Saha v. Bablu Saha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sutapa Saha v. Bablu Saha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shrabanti Sonkar Vs Reliance General Insurance Company Limited and Ors.

Jahanara Begam Vs Paritosh Ghosh & Anr.

Gourab Goswami and Anr. Vs Sriram General Ins Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Sudha Devi Tibrewal Vs Virendra Pal Marjara

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Pramshila Devi & Anr.

Manisha Karki Sharma Alias Manisha Karki Vs Vijay Kumar Sharma