Allowed

Rajesh Verma v. the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Calcutta HC2 May 2022APOT/54/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against single judge order on unauthorized footpath encroachment. Court noted corporation ordered removal. Directed corporation to remove encroachments at defaulters' cost with police assistance if needed. Appeal disposed accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Directed Corporation to remove unauthorized structures at cost of respondents; police to render assistance for implementation.

Rajesh Verma Vs the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

OD-1

¶3

I.A./GA 1 OF 2022 With WPO/971/2022 IN

¶4

APOT/54/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE

¶5

RAJESH VERMA

¶6

¶7

THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.

¶8

BEFORE:

¶9

The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA Date : 2^nd May, 2022.

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty, Advocate Md.Apzal Ansari,Advocate …. for appellant/petitioner.

¶12

Mr.Aloke Kr.Ghosh,Advocate …for KMC.

¶13

THE COURT: Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be

¶14

kept with the records.

¶15

The writ petitioner/appellant had approached the learned single Judge with the grievance that the private respondent Nos.6 to 13 had made unauthroized constructions on footpath maintained by the Kolkata Municipal

¶16

¶17

Corporation. The writ petitioner/appellant runs a shop-room adjacent to the place where such unauthorized construction has been erected. Such construction is causing severe inconvenience and obstruction to the business of the writ petitioner. A complaint lodged with the Municipal Commissioner has not yielded any result. The learned Judge directed the Corporation to look into the matter and to take appropriate steps after hearing all the parties.

¶18

The writ petitioner has come up in appeal being aggrieved by the detailed procedure laid down by the learned Judge in the order under appeal.

¶19

Mr.Ghosh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Corporation produced records from which we find that the Corporation held a meeting where all concerned parties were heard. An order has been passed for removal of unauthorized constructions. Hence, the writ petitioner’s grievance appears to have been redressed.

¶20

Let the documents produced by the Corporation be kept with the records. Mr.Chakraborty, learned advocate for the appellant says that the order that has been passed by the Corporation directs the persons responsible to remove the unauthorized constructions which are encroaching on public road, within a month from April 29, 2022, i.e. the date when the order was passed by the Executive Engineer without, however, saying what will happen in case of default on the part of the persons responsible in removing the unauthorized structures. We direct that in the event, the persons responsible fail to remove the unauthorized constructions or any other encroachment on public road, the Corporation shall forthwith remove such structures and clear the encroachment from public road at the cost and expense of the private

¶21

¶22

respondents. In such event, if the Corporation officers require police help, they will be at liberty to approach the Officer-in-charge of the jurisdictional police station for assistance and if so approached, the Officer-in-charge shall render full cooperation to the Corporation officers in implementing the present order.

¶23

The appeal and the connected application are disposed of accordingly.

¶24

(ARIJIT BANERJEE, J)

¶25

(KAUSIK CHANDA, J.)

¶26

ssaha AR(CR)

Rajesh Verma v. the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Verma v. the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of W B & Ors. Vs Sekh Mariyam & Ors.

Abdul Halim Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Rajkumartola Matshyajibi Samabay Samity Ltd. & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Bidjut Roy & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Shirajul Islam Molla Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Mamoni Bhanja Barman Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.