Limited order where petitioner advocates submitted an instruction for withdrawal of the writ petition Consequently the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-44
WPO No. 684 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
THE PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO. LTD. & ANR. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), KOLKATA & ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date : 5th August, 2021
(Via Video Conference)
Mr. Gopal Ram Sharma, Adv. … for Petitioners
The Court : Mr. Sharma, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits on instruction that his client wants to withdraw this writ petition. Accordingly, this petition being WPO No. 684 of 2016 is dismissed as withdrawn.
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
SN AR(CR)
The Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Kolkata & Ors.
Md. Nizamuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
