The petitioner, appearing through counsel, submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition on these grounds. No substantive legal principles were discussed or applied.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPO/1070/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
NITAI KUMAR BARIK VS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHEKHAR B. SARAF Date : 27th August, 2021.
Appearance: Mr. Shaktipada Jana, Adv. …for petitioner.
The Court : Mr. Shaktipada Jana, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this writ petition as the matter has become infructuous.
In light of the above submissions, this writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
(SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.)
SK.
NITAI KUMAR BARIK
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
SHEKHAR B. SARAF
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
