Writ petition dismissed as not pressed after petitioners' counsel provided oral instruction to withdraw the proceedings without filing a written instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.12.2021 Court No.4 Item No.43 SB
WPLRT 68 of 2021
M/S. South City Projects (Kolkata) Limited & Ors. Vs
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Saptarshi Datta Mr. Pourush Kanti Pal …. For the petitioners
Learned counsel appears on behalf of the petitioners submits that his senior Mr. Saptarshi Datta is the advocate-onrecord of the petitioners and both the advocates have received an instruction from the writ petitioners that they do not intend to proceed with the instant writ petition. Though no written instruction has been filed today but an assurance has been given by Mr. Pourush Kanti Paul that he received the oral instruction and there is no impediment in dismissing the writ petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
(Harish Tandon, J.)
M/S. South City Projects (Kolkata) Limited & Ors.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
Harish Tandon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
