Allowed

M/S Baid Distributors (P) Limited v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC22 Nov 2021WPA/944/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner claimed unpaid dues of approximately Rs. 10.32 lakhs for medical oxygen supplied to Darjeeling district. Court directed the Additional Director to release the disputed funds within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Order directing Respondent no.4 to release disputed fund of Rs. 10,32,499/- within four weeks with 8% simple interest per annum.

M/S Baid Distributors (P) Limited Vs the State of West… — Property and Title | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE SIDE

¶2

22.11.2021 Crt. No.1. K.B./b.r. Item No.2

¶3

W.P.A. 944 of 2021

¶4

M/s. Baid Distributors(P) Limited -Vs.-

¶5

Government of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

Ms. Sidhi Sethia Ms. Rima Sarkar ........for the petitioner.

¶7

Mr. Hirak Barman Mr. Momenur Rahaman .... for the State.

¶8

Party/parties is/are represented in the order of their name/names as printed above in the cause title.

¶9

The petitioner is a distributor of medical oxygen. The petitioner supplied medical oxygen as per the requirement of the Respondent no.3/the Chief Medical Officer of Health (CMOH), Darjeeling.

¶10

The medical oxygen was supplied between the Financial Year (FY) 2014-2015 regularly

¶11

¶12

upto FY 2018-2019. The petitioner claims a total outstanding of Rs.10,32,499/- (Ten lacs Thirty Two Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Nine only) as the admitted outstanding amount payable against the supply of medical oxygen. Learned Counsel for the petitioner strongly relies upon a communication dated 1^st January, 2020 and 22^nd June, 2020 addressed by the Respondent no.3/the CMOH, Darjeeling to the Respondent no.4/the Additional Director of Health Service (AA & V), West Bengal.

¶13

From the communication as aforementioned, the petitioner points out that there is no dispute with regard to the total as aforesaid being payable and the only reason the CMOH cites is lack of allotment of fund to the CMOH/the Respondent no.3 from the office of the Respondent no.4/the Additional Director(supra).

¶14

Learned Counsel for the CMOH does not dispute the communication dated 1^st January, 2020 and 22^nd June, 2020 (supra ). It is submitted that the CMOH can only release the

¶15

¶16

fund if disbursed by the Respondent no.4 under the aforementioned facts. The prayer is made on behalf of both the parties for a direction on the Respondent 4/the Additional Director.

¶17

Having heard the parties and considering the materials placed, the Respondent no.4/the Additional Director (supra) is directed to take steps to release the fund as stated above forthwith and not later than a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.

¶18

The fund shall carry a simple interest of 8% p.a.

¶19

Upon the above direction being made, this writ petition requires not to be detained further.

¶20

Affidavits are neither necessary nor invited. Other allegations are therefore deemed to be denied and disputed.

¶21

WPA 944 of 2021 stands thus disposed of.

¶22

¶23

All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶24

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all necessary formalities.

¶25

(Subrata Talukdar, J.)

M/S Baid Distributors (P) Limited v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Baid Distributors (P) Limited v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghunath Karfa Vs Umesh Kumar Roy and Ors.

Lina Dutta Vs Sukumar Bera & Ors.

Ashok Kumar Shaw & Ors. Vs First Land Acquisition Collector, Kol & Ors.

Sibesh Chakraborty Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Ganesh Barman Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Ghanayshyam Chettri Vs Babita Chettri