The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 6942 of 2019 as 'not pressed' upon the petitioner's communication that his advocate instructed him to cease proceedings. The order remains subject to the retention of the petitioner's letter and compliance with formalities for certified copies.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 24
04.08.2021
(Item No. 81)
(AB)
WPA 6942 of 2019 (via video conference)
Prof. Dr. Narayan Banerjee VS
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Bikram Banerjee Mr. Saikat Sutradhar
……….. For the petitioner Mr. Santanu Kumar Mitra Mr. Mirza Kamruddin
……. For the State
The petitioner has communicated to his learned advocate on record that since he has already received his retiral dues he is no longer interested to proceed with the writ petition.
In view of such submission WPA 6942 of 2019 stands dismissed as “not pressed”.
The copy of the letter written by the petitioner to the learned advocate on record be retained with the records.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Prof. Dr. Narayan Banerjee
The State of West Bengal
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
