The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the constitutional writ petition as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel stated they did not intend to proceed further with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01 17.08.2021 . d.p.
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
W.P.A 5209 of 2012 (Via Video Conference)
Sukhendu Prasad Ray -versus
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Gaurav Purkayastha. …For the Petitioner.
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that his client does not intend to proceed with the writ petition any further.
In view of such submission, W.P.A. 5209 of 2012 stands dismissed as ‘not pressed’.
Photocopy of an electronic mail dated 15th August, 2021 sent by the petitioner to his learned advocate be retained with the records.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
( Amrita Sinha, J.)
Sukhendu Prasad Ray
State of West Bengal
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
