S.Subramanian v. M.Raju
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court Circuit Bench at Port Blair, while hearing a contempt application (CPAN/12/2021), referred the matter to the Principal seat as the relevant judge was available there. Disposition: Adjourned/Referred.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
CPAN/12/2021 With WPA/43/2021
S.Subramanian
… Petitioner
Vs.
M.Raju … Respondent
Mr.G.Binnu Kumar, Advocate … for the petitioner
September 10, 2021 [GNC] Item Nos.21 with 22.
It appears that the instant contempt application has been taken out alleging willful and deliberate violation of an order dated 19th March, 2021 passed by Justice Arijit Banerjee. Since His Lordship is available, this matter cannot be taken up by this Bench.
The Registry is directed to send the file to the Principal seat of the High Court so that the matter can be placed before the same Hon’ble Judge.
(Harish Tandon, J. )
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Subramanian
- respondent
M.Raju
Coram
Harish Tandon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPA/43/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court