In a writ petition, the Court directed the Director of Pension to include the petitioner's spouse as a nominee in the Pension Payment Order within six weeks following a recommendation by the District Inspector of Schools.
Directed the Director of Pension to include Shyamali Pal as a nominee in the Pension Payment Order within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.04.2021 ss
W.P.A. 4257 of 2020
Sudhir Chandra Sau Vs.
The State of West Bengal & ors.
Mr. Sarwar Jahan Mr. Sudipta Maiti Ms. Pritikana Gantait … for the Petitioner
Mr. Gautam Basu … for the State
Mr. Gautam Basu, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents submits that the District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Purba Medinipur (in short, ‘the D.I. of Schools’) has recommended the case of the petitioner to the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance (in short, ‘the D.P.P.G.’). However, he does not have any instruction from the D.P.P.G.
Accordingly, Counsel for the State submits that necessary order may be passed so that the D.P.P.G. may act on the recommendation of the D.I. of Schools.
In light of the above submissions, the D.P.P.G. being the respondent no.4 is directed to include the name of Shyamali Pal, wife of the petitioner, as nominee in the Pension Payment Order within a period of six weeks from date.
In light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of.
2
Since no affidavit-in-opposition is called for,
allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.
All parties are to act on website copy of this order.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Sudhir Chandra Sau
The State of West Bengal
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
