Disposed

Atul Chandra Maiti v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC16 Mar 2021WPA/3863/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition urging consideration of a representation regarding illegal construction in agricultural land. Court disposed of the petition by directing the Gram Panchayet to decide the representation within six months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent Gram Panchayet to consider the petitioner's representation on illegal construction and pass a reasoned order within six months after hearing necessary parties.

Atul Chandra Maiti Vs State of West Bengal… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

16.03.2021 SL No. 116 Court No.24 (P.M.)

¶2

WPA 3863 of 2021

¶3

Atul Chandra Maiti Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Salil Maiti, Mr. Pinaki Saha … for the petitioner

¶5

The petitioner alleges illegal and unauthorized construction without a sanction plan in an agricultural plot of land without conversion of the same in the Plot Nos. 244 and 245, Mouza Khalsa Bamanpur, J.L. No. 97.

¶6

The petitioner complains that the objection raised against such illegal construction has not been considered by the respondent authorities till date.

¶7

As it appears that the representation of the petitioner objecting to the illegal and unauthorized construction is pending consideration at the end of the respondent authorities, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

¶8

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of by directing the respondent no. 5, Prodhan, Satish Samanta Gram Panchayet to consider and dispose of the representation made by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties, including the petitioner, at the earliest, but positively within a period of six months from the date of

¶9

¶10

communication of a copy of this order. The said respondent shall pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to all the necessary parties including the petitioner immediately thereafter.

¶11

In the event the aforesaid respondent is of the considered opinion that the construction has been made either in violation of the plan sanctioned or devoid the sanction plan, then necessary steps shall be taken to deal with such unauthorised construction, in accordance with law.

¶12

The aforesaid respondent shall restrict the consideration of the representation with regard to unauthorized construction only and not enter into or decide any private dispute of the parties regarding right, title and interest in respect of the aforesaid land.

¶13

It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner and all points are left open to be decided by the aforesaid respondent at the time of consideration of the representation of the petitioner.

¶14

The petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the representation dated 1^st December, 2020 to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of the Court.

¶15

WPA 3863 of 2021 stands disposed of.

¶16

Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record.

¶17

¶18

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on completion of usual formalities.

¶19

( Amrita Sinha, J.)

Atul Chandra Maiti v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Atul Chandra Maiti v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basanti Joshi Vs the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Krishna Sankar Ganguly Vs the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

India Motor Parts and Accessories Ltd. and Anr. Vs the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Samir Chanda Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sampa Dutta and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Samir Nandi Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.