The High Court at Calcutta dismissed WPA/293/2019 as infructuous due to the efflux of time. No substantive legal question was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR]
**
WPA/293/2019
Rajesh Ram … petitioner
Vs.
Andaman and Nicobar
Administration and others
... Respondents
Mr. D.C. Kabir, Advocate …. for the petitioner
Mr. Arul Prasanth, Advocate … for the respondents
November 9, 2021 [SR]
Item No.60
The learned advocate for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time. In view of such submission, WPA/293/2019 is dismissed as ‘infructuous’.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of usual necessary formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Rajesh Ram
Andaman and Nicobar Administration
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
