M/S Crown Tannery v. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition. The petitioner argued that recovery proceedings should stop because a review application was filed. The Court noted the review was rejected and prayers remained unaccepted due to non-production of documents. Consequently, it found no merit and dismissed the petition. Section 17 of the Rajasthan Act was referenced in the header date line.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to collect copy of letter dated 11.11.2020; recovery proceedings to proceed.