The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits as follows. The grandfather of the petitioners executed a Will in favour of the petitioners and one Deena Nath Pandey in 1991. In 1993, the executant of the Will passed away. In 1995, a mutation was affected in favour of all the legal heirs. However, in 1999, the learned District Judge refused to grant probate and in 2001, a Division Bench of this Court granted probate in respect of the Will. Subsequently, a certificate of probate was also issued in favour of the petitioners. In 2003, the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs issued a letter to the Chief Secretary of the Andaman and Nicobar Administration for regularization of excess land. In 2011, the petitioners made a representation before the revenue authorities for regularization of the excess land. On 23.06.2013, this Court directed the respondent no.1 to decide the matter. On 20.08.2014, the respondent no.1 conducted the proceeding and passed an order. This was challenged by some private parties in a writ application before this Court and the same was dismissed on 17.03.2016. On
