Allowed

Uday Rai v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC20 Dec 2021WPA/2492/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge disposition of a writ petition held that the petitioner, a retired Assistant Teacher, is entitled to interest on revised gratuity and arrear pension under ROPA 2019. The court directed respondents to pay 8% interest from February 14, 2020.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to pay petitioner interest @ 8% per annum on revised gratuity and revised arrear pension from February 14, 2020 till actual payment.

Uday Rai Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

20-12-2021 SL. No.42 Court No.2 GB

¶2

Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri

¶3

W.P.A. No. 2492 of 2021

¶4

Uday Rai Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶5

Ms. Arpita Saha.

¶6

…for the Petitioner. Mr. Hirak Barman, Mr. Pretom Das. …for the State.

¶7

Affidavit of service filed in Court today be taken on record.

¶8

The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a High School, who retired from service on 31.12.2019. The pension Payment Order was first issued in favour of the petitioner on 17.12.2019 and after introduction of ROPA, 2019, revised pension payment order was issued on 16.08.2021. The petitioner received the retirement benefits on 06.10.2021 on the basis of ROPA 2019.

¶9

Having regard to the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court dated August 14, 2013 in MAT 1118 of 2013 read with the circular dated June 25, 2002 issued by the Joint Director of Treasuries and Accounts, West Bengal, it was held that there could not be any dispute to the entitlement of interest on the amount of revised gratuity and revised arrear pension based on ROPA 2009, to be payable from May 19, 2009. Thus, in this case as well, the same ratio would apply with regard to payment of interest after ROPA, 2019 had come into effect.

¶10

In view thereof, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondents and particularly the concerned Treasury Officer to pay to the petitioner interest

¶11

¶12

on the revised gratuity and revised arrear pension @ 8% per annum from February 14, 2020 till the date of actual payment within four weeks from the date of service of an authenticated copy of this order.

¶13

Needless to mention that before any disbursement is made, the disbursing authority shall satisfy himself about the genuineness of the claim and verify the signature and identity of the claimant, who is before this Court.

¶14

With the aforesaid observation and directions, this writ application stands disposed of.

¶15

There will, however, be no order as to costs.

¶16

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for be given to the petitioner on priority basis.

¶17

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

Uday Rai v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uday Rai v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mithu Das Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Rakesh Agarwal Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Kamlesh Singh @ Kamalesh Singh Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Ananta Ray Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Pranab Sharma Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Nilima Dan Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.