Dismissed
P.Venkateshwar Rao v. Andaman and Nicobar Administration and Anr.
Calcutta HCWPA/238/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
WPA/238/2021
P.Venkateshwar Rao
… Petitioner
Vs.
The Andaman and Nicobar Administration & another
… Respondents
Mr.K.Vijay Kumar, Advocate … for the petitioner Mr.Krishna Rao, Advocate … for the respondents
September 20, 2021 [GNC] Item No.24
The learned advocate for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant writ petition as his client wants to move before the appropriate forum for ventilating his grievances.
Accordingly, the prayer for withdrawal is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Dismissal of the writ petition shall not preclude the writ petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for the selfsame relief and if such approach is made the said authority would decide the same independently without being influenced by the fact that the writ petition was withdrawn.
( Harish Tandon, J. )
P.Venkateshwar Rao
The Andaman and Nicobar Administration
Harish Tandon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court