In a WPA regarding subsequent facts, the Calcutta High Court dismissed the application as not pressed, granted liberty to file afresh, and vacated the interim order.
Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7 11.01.2021 rrc
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APELLATE SIDE
WPA 21977 of 2019
Narayan Chandra Maity
- Versus –
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Gautam Guria
Mr. Samrat Sen Mr. Amitava Mitra Mr. Saikat Chatterjee …..For the State
Mr. Gautam Guria appears for the petitioner. He submits that leave may be given to the petitioner to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh by bringing on record certain facts which have taken place after filing of the present writ petition.
Mr. Sen appearing for the State respondents does not oppose the prayer of the petitioner.
In view of the above, the application WPA 21977 of 2019 stands dismissed as not pressed.
The petitioner will be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition to challenge the subsequent events.
Interim order passed, if any, stands vacated.
( Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J. )
Narayan Chandra Maity
The State of West Bengal
Ashis Kumar Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
